A Chinese-speaking hacker used autonomous AI agents to compromise websites belonging to more than 100 companies, spending an estimated $5,000 in AI tokens.
Reuters and NorForge research published October 19 revealed how one operator delegated most intrusion work to software, scaling attacks with minimal human involvement.
The campaign attempted to breach more than 1,200 websites. Identified victims included Deere, SharkNinja, and Cummins, although the affected environments and reported consequences differed. Reuters could not establish the extent of unauthorized data extraction.
Hacker Uses AI Agents to Breach
NorForge principal threat researcher Snorre Fagerland discovered the activity while investigating exposed Cairn instances, an open-source problem-solving platform.
More than 20 publicly accessible dashboards appeared linked to malicious operations, revealing targeting instructions, agent decisions, credentials, and exploitation results.
The most prolific Chinese-language cluster, tracked as AIA0001, operated more than 1,100 attack projects across 14 associated dashboards.

Its targets included e-commerce websites in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Australia. NorForge assessed that the operator sought persistent access to shopping and payment infrastructure for later monetization.
Cairn structures projects around an initial state and an objective. Agents generate “intents,” representing planned actions, and “facts,” representing discoveries.
A shared blackboard lets workers reuse findings, revise hypotheses, and explore alternative attack paths without continuous human direction. The targeting pipeline used Playwright to verify that shopping websites worked.
Instructions prioritized unauthenticated remote code execution, SQL injection, unsafe deserialization, authentication bypass, and vulnerable uploads. Requested payloads included uploader shells designed to preserve access.

NorForge independently confirmed an uploader shell on a vendor’s website. The agent attributed the compromise to unauthorized write access to a memcached session store, unsafe PHP object deserialization, and a gadget chain involving legacy Zend Framework components. Researchers did not independently validate every exploitation step.
Exposed worker directories contained Nmap, OWASP Amass, dnsrecon, ffuf, PHPGGC, Python, and Docker. A worker identifier suggested Claude Code orchestration using a DeepSeek model, but NorForge treated that interpretation cautiously.
Successful AIA0001 projects averaged just under 23 hours. Across observed campaigns, NorForge estimated approximately 10% success, warning that differing objectives prevented straightforward comparisons.
Reuters reported approximately $50 per successful intrusion; NorForge estimated roughly $5 per task, including failures. Both cost estimates remain uncertain because actual token-consumption records were unavailable.
Deere reported remediation and no indication that sensitive information was accessed. SharkNinja said the incident affected a standalone product-support website. Cummins was investigating a third-party vendor website that may have been affected.
The dashboards also exposed hundreds of credentials and other secrets, with TruffleHog verifying 11% as valid. This created additional exposure beyond the original intrusions: the attackers’ own unsecured AI infrastructure made sensitive victim information publicly available.
IOCs
| IOC | Notes |
|---|---|
199.247.25.25 | AIA0002 staging server |
199.247.27.2 | AIA0002 staging server |
46.8.xxx.xx9:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
95.182.xxx.x42:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
31.56.xxx.xx7:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
31.57.xxx.xx9:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
46.8.xxx.xx3:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
94.183.xxx.xx3:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
94.183.xxx.x34:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
31.59.xxx.xx5:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
95.182.xxx.x12:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
31.59.xxx.xx7:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
94.183.xxx.x54:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
95.182.xxx.xx5:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
94.183.xxx.xx8:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
31.59.xxx.xx3:8000 | AIA0001 panel |
108.61.xxx.xx6:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
66.42.xxx.xx9:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
95.179.xxx.xx3:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
45.63.xxx.xx7:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
136.244.xxx.xx6:8000 | AIA0002 panel and staging |
45.76.xxx.xx0:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
209.250.xxx.xx8:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
95.85.xxx.xx9:8000 | AIA0002 panel and staging |
136.244.xxx.x86:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
64.176.xxx.xx3:8000 | AIA0002 panel |
143.246.xxx.xx1:8000 | AIA0003 panel |
Note: IP addresses and domains are intentionally defanged (e.g., [.]) to prevent accidental resolution or hyperlinking. Re-fang only within controlled threat intelligence platforms such as MISP, VirusTotal, or your SIEM.
Join 16,000+ SOC teams using ANY.RUN to streamline threat investigations and reduce manual effort. Explore for your team
The post Hacker Uses AI Agents to Breach Over 100 Websites for Just $5,000 appeared first on Cyber Security News.